Hi Torsten, This wasn't using Cocoon, but one of my co-workers did a performance comparison among Xalan2, Saxon (6.5, I believe), and JD (pre-1.2.5, but don't remember the specific version). If I remember right, Saxon was 2-3 times as fast as Xalan2, and JD was 2-3 times as fast as Saxon. Sorry I don't remember the details, though.
Harry PS Just FYI, we've been using Saxon 6.5 with Cocoon 2.0.2, and it's been fine except for a minor bug in the sitemap.xsl that Xalan is more forgiving of (though everything was good once we fixed the sitemap.xsl bug). -----Original Message----- From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vadim Gritsenko Subject: Re: Need to replace xalan On Monday 06 May 2002 20:11, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Try saxon-6.5.2.jar. Works for me. > > Vadim Just wondering... how is the speed compared to Xalan? -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
