On 06.Jun.2002 -- 09:40 PM, Christian Haul wrote:
> Frank Taffelt wrote:
> >it seems that new MODDB Actions doesn't alway's process the tables in the
> >right order.
> >
> >In my understanding the processorder of the tables is determined by their
> >order in the table-set element.
> >Under some circumstances this order is violated.
>
> Mmmh, no. They are processed in table definition order. Always. Should
> have been documented, I think. It stems from the fact that you could use
> the action without any table-set -- then all tables would be used. This
> is a) because the actions started as a patche :-) of the original
> actions and b) for compatibility with them.
>
> I agree, that it is desireable to control the order data is inserted.
> Actually, it would make the setup even easier.
>
> So, no its not a bug but a feature. Anyway, if no one objects I'm happy
> to change that behaviour. I reckon that no-one relies on working without
> table-sets anyway.
I've committed the change to HEAD. Behaviour without tablesets is
unchanged.
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
