Just out of curiosity - what does a "clean" cocoon consist of? batik-all-1.5b2.jar bsf-2.2.jar commons-jxpath.jar commons-logging-1.0.jar deli-0.6.5.jar fop-0.20.3.jar hsqldb-1.61.jar jakarta-poi-1.6.0-dev-20020505.jar jena-1.3.0.jar jimi-1.0.jar jisp_1_0_2.jar jstyle.jar jtidy-04aug2000r7-dev.jar lucene-1.2-rc2.jar maybeupload_1-0-5pre3.jar pizza-1.1.jar rdffilter.jar resolver-20020130.jar rhino1.5r4-continuations-20020429.jar servlet_2_2.jar velocity-1.2.jar xmldb-api-20011111.jar
? There's lots there I don't use which I *know* some people need - and vice-versa. How do we please everyone? > From: Ricardo Trindade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Hi, > > I agree, I started a thread with exactly the same > content a while ago, some > people were against, some were for it. > > I thinks this is essential to simplify cocoon > deployment, and to guarantee > that most installations are "out of the box". > > A lot of people answered that a ant build target > existed which did > something like that. If it does, why not release the built > release as a > binary ? There are a lot of users that don't want to compile > cocoon, and > shouldn't be forced to do it. I think the ability to use > binaries most of > the time is a sign of stability... > > > From: Alexander Schatten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > As there was a long discussion about Cocoon problems, I want to adress > > another one: > > > > It is fine to have examples in the Cocoon installation, but in > > production use, you need a "clean" cocoon installation. > > > > this is not SO easy, as you have to remove all unnecessary sitemap > > entries, as well as example data... This is being worked on. It's call refactoring and it's proceeding in cvs HEAD. > > So it should be possible to download a "clean" cocoon version for > > production use, containing only the necessary sitemap entries for the > > standard serializers, generators... Please, define standard. > > this would be extremely useful. Agreed - but *very* difficult to decide on. > > the second best version would be a documentation how to remove the > > unecessary stuff. Isn't this documented? Patch appreciated ;) J. ======================================================================= Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use of this email. Experian Limited (registration number 653331). Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
