Geoff Howard dijo:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fabricio Chalub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:02 PM
>> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> Subject: Cocoon 2.1 (was RE: Question about handling of components)
> <snip/>
>
>> Regarding 2.1, I may be wrong, but my impression is that there
>> hasn't been a complete overhaul of the entire Cocoon core since
>> 2.0, so probably the 'old' 2.0 components are as stable as ever
>> in 2.1, while the new features are still a little turbulent and
>> thus should be used with caution.
>>
>> Is this feeling true?  Is there anybody here using 2.1.x on
>> production servers?  How's the stability?
>
> I think the stability you most need to worry about is stability of the
> API - meaning that 2.1 status is currently in flux even as to how things
> work and what they are named.  If you're going to use 2.1 (as I am on
> live projects) you need to at least monitor the dev mailing list for any
> discussion on any feature you are using so that you can be forewarned if
> the API is changing. You'll also need to be prepared to update from CVS
> fairly frequently, which can be a task depending on the complexity of
> your project and the
> sophistication of your own project's build procedures as relate to
> cocoons.
>
> Geoff Howard

Yes, the complexity of your project will increase, but the reward for
using the lastest Cocoon developed technology is priceless! ;-D

Antonio Gallardo.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting.     <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting.     <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to