On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 05:14:48PM +0100, E. Rosten wrote:
> CODA_LOOKUP is issued, to which I reply with ENOENT (I assume that this is
> the correct thing to do here). Coda then follows up with a CODA_CREATE.
Returning -ENOENT is definitely the correct thing, the failed lookup
will then result in a negative directory cache entry in the kernel
(dentry without inode).
> I reply with a new FID and a sensible set of attributes (I know they're
> sensible, since I use them in the reply to CODA_GETATTR). However,
Are you sure you don't want to correct the following? I don't think
request.coda_create.attr is ever set to anything useful.
gnokiifs.cpp:487
TDEBUG("Creating remote file...");
- reply.coda_create.attr = request.coda_create.attr;
+ reply.coda_create.attr = default_fatts;
VFid = gimme_a_fid();
Jan
