On 4 Feb 2001, at 16:11, Jan Harkes wrote:
> As far as server-server, updateclnt-updatesrv, and volutil-server are
> concerned, Servers are assumed to be co-located (i.e. in the same
> machine room), so they will have problems with firewalls. I don't think
> that `fixing' this is very important as it actually improve security (or at
> least obscurity) of these daemons behind a firewall.
Bummer.
Well I'm running 3 coda servers.. one of which is outside my firewall and
behind it's own firewall.
Soon I'll add a 4th server, also behind it's own firewall.
"Co-Located" probably isn't really the definition you mean. I suspect "well
connected" is a better requirement, in which case the number of
intervening firewalls shouldn't really matter. So long as the connectivity is
good.
In my case, it's good.. but I also need firewall security at both locations.
> > What's the best way to fix this? Can someone point me towards the
> > offending sub-system or code? Maybe I can take a whack at the problem.
>
> Eh, it doesn't really fall into any subsystem. It involves (at least)
> the following daemons and applications: updateclnt, updatesrv, volutil,
> codasrv, backup.
Oh boy.
Brad Clements, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (315)268-1000
http://www.murkworks.com (315)268-9812 Fax
netmeeting: ils://ils.murkworks.com AOL-IM: BKClements