On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:43:15AM +1000, Nick Andrew wrote: > > I guess it must be hard to do, if people always talk about it but > never do it. I imagine that the union filesystem code has to map the > inode numbers from its two (or more) underlying filesystems, into one > inode space for return to the kernel and user applications. >
and handle deletions on the "upper" layer (aka whiteouts) and a few other things. Since others are doing pluggings.... if you want a working union filesystem now then perhaps you should consider NetBSD or FreeBSD, both support Coda and unionfs though I am not sure about mounting something else over the top of Coda! -- Brett Lymn
