On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Buck Golemon <[email protected]> wrote: > Can any of you all give me your triage analysis of this issue? > https://bitbucket.org/logilab/astroid/issue/7/very-long-run-time-and-or-stack-overflow
I have no opinion about triaging that. > --- > Three less-important questions regarding pylint support. > > I've tried to discuss this issue several times on #pylint, to no avail. > Is that IRC channel actually functional? I don't personally know. > I've tried to notify the ops that a logging bot has joined the channel, but > I don't believe the message was received > (http://irclogs.jackgrigg.com/irc.freenode.net/pylint/2013-10-18). Generally, if I were the channel owner, I wouldn't appreciate anyone inviting a bot to log my channel. That said, I'm not the channel owner so they may be fine with it. Still seems kind of bold to do arbitrarily and without having any ability to tell others they're being logged, especially when it's Freenode's policy that all users be notified. > The pylint website gives [email protected] as the mailing > list, but the README gives [email protected]. Is one of these wrong? I believe when I launched this list with Florent and Tarek that PyLint said they were merging their list into this one. The website is sadily probably out-of-date. Thanks for bringing this up since I'm sure it will serve as a reminder to someone who can take care of this. _______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
