+1 for Austin. Especially if we can time it the week before or after SXSW.
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed -----Original Message----- From: Becky Yoose <b.yo...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:44:44 To: <CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib 2011 Proposals Any word on if the Austin, TX folks are going to submit a proposal this year? They had a pretty good run for votes last year... Thanks, Becky import motivation On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Edward M. Corrado <ecorr...@ecorrado.us>wrote: > Loins, Daniel wrote: > >> Well, I've been meaning to toss New Haven, CT, into the ring, but was >> waiting to get more feedback/expressions of interest from my colleagues here >> (and also thinking that 2012 might be better for East Coast). >> >> Anyway, I can try to have a skeletal proposal ready by the 5th (unless >> someone at Yale tries to talk me out of it). >> Daniel >> >> > Personally, I think the more applications the better. So I say go for it. > Also, I hope some of the sites that weren't voted in last time re-submit > their application. > > Edward > > >
