Quoting "Walker, David" <[email protected]>:
Here are some stats from Cal State San Marcos for the past 6 1/2
years (2003-10) . All searches other than keyword are browse
searches.
keyword = 596,111
title = 158,761
author = 59,293
subject = 23,692
call number = 9,477
form / genre = 4,838
other numbers = 14,636
So:
keyword = 596,111
browse = 270,697
This is an interesting example of how the interface guides (or
constrains, in this case) users. If you want to do a title "search"
you have only the browse option. The FCLA system has both title
keyword search and title browse. In that catalog, only 3% of the users
opted to browse. In the figure above, all we know is that some
percentage of users wanted to search on title, and browse was the only
option.
kc
These stats only tracked searches that were performed from the
catalog home page [1] or that of the library website [2]. Any
subsequent searches performed inside the catalog itself are not
counted here.
I'm not sure if this is really showing that a browse display is
popular here, though. I suspect a good number of users (other than
librarians) were expecting the title and author searches to behave
like the keyword search. But those options are browse searches, so
they generate hits in favor of the browse.
--Dave
[1] http://library.csusm.edu/catalog/
[2] http://biblio.csusm.edu/
==================
David Walker
Library Web Services Manager
California State University
http://xerxes.calstate.edu
________________________________________
From: Code for Libraries [[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Bill Dueber [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [CODE4LIB] A call for your OPAC (or other system)
statistics! (Browse interfaces)
I got email from a person today saying, and I quote,
"I must say that [the lack of a browse interface] come as a shock (*which
interface cannot browse??*)"
[Emphasis mine]
Here, a "browse interface" is one where you can get a giant list of all the
titles/authors/subjects whatever -- a view on the data devoid of any
searching.
Will those of you out there with "browse interfaces" in your system take a
couple minutes to send along a guesstimate of what percentage of patron
sessions involve their use?
[Note that for right now, I'm excluding "type-ahead" search boxes although
there's an obvious and, in my mind, strong argument to be made that they're
substantially similar for many types of data]
We don't have a browse interface on our (VuFind) OPAC right now. But in the
interest of paying it forward, I can tell you that in Mirlyn, our OPAC, has
numbers like this:
Pct of Mirlyn sessions, Feb/March/April 2010, which included at least one
basic
search and also:
Go to full record view 46% (we put a lot of info in search results)
Select/"favorite" an item 15%
Add a facet: 13%
Export record(s)
to email/refworks/RIS/etc. 3.4%
Send to phone (sms) 0.21%
Click on faq/help/AskUs
in footer 0.17% (324 total)
Based on 187,784 sessions, 2010.02.01 to 2010.04.31
So...anyone out there able to tell me anything about browse interfaces?
--
Bill Dueber
Library Systems Programmer
University of Michigan Library
--
Karen Coyle
[email protected] http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 1-510-435-8234 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
skype: kcoylenet
