Hi Nathan,

Aside from just load time, there's another point that you might want to 
consider:  the last time that I checked, Google would only index our particular 
pages up to 1 MB (though this value certainly isn't static, and 5 MB might be 
the new limit in the near future / already for some sites).  So, if you're not 
splitting this file up, you should also be aware that not all of the contents 
will be indexed by external search engines.

Since this particular finding aid of yours has already been split into 10 
different series, though, I think that that would be most logical method to 
split things up (and that should take care of both problems, while presenting 
one more problem of making sure that everything is still presented in a 
user-friendly way).


Mark 


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Brian 
Tingle
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 4:15 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] HTML Load Time

> If I split the page into say three parts and then combined them on one page
> using the include function of PHP, would I still have to same problem?

I don't think this will really help any, because the files would still
be combined together on your side
of the server and the large file will go over the wire and be loaded
into a ~5MB file in the local browser.

The static HTML page is pretty much as fast as you can get on the server side.

Reply via email to