Hi Matt,
 
That's tricky.  Copyright owners control the right to make derivatives of their 
work.  So, creating a new image using theirs could be construed as a derivative 
image, especially if you're using their entire image.
 
You could take a look at this Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Media 
Literacy Education 
(http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/fair-use/related-materials/codes/code-best-practices-fair-use-media-literacy-education)
 and see if it helps you with interpreting what you would like to do with the 
images.
 
Also, it doesn't matter if the image is common on the web.  What matters is who 
owns the actual image.  There are plenty of images on the web that are free to 
use or have creative commons licensing (but still require attribution) that may 
be better for you to start with.  This site 
(http://copyrightfriendly.wikispaces.com/) tries to link you to places with 
copyright friendly images.  
 
Laura
 
Laura Pope Robbins
Associate Professor/Reference Librarian
Dowling College / Library
150 Idle Hour Boulevard
Oakdale, NY 11769
 
Phone: (631) 244-5023
Fax: (631) 244- 3374
E-mail: pope-...@dowling.edu
 
 

"A mind needs books as a sword needs a whetstone, if it is to keep its 
edge."--Tyrion Lannister in A Game of Thrones 
by George R.R. Martin


>>> Matt Amory <matt.am...@gmail.com> 3/12/2012 10:51 AM >>>
I'm working with a set of images of artworks (images which are common on
the web for the most part) and I'm wondering if there is a way to layer
multiple "possibly-subject-to-copyright-claim" images together into a
single layered image which would not be subject to any copyright claim.

Since the GIMP'ed image I would be presenting would be different from any
of its constituent parts, could I post it without fear of takedown orders?
Or is this a dubious strategy?

Thanks for pondering

-- 
Matt Amory
(917) 771-4157
matt.am...@gmail.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matt-amory/8/515/239

Reply via email to