I do not regard threats of violence as "humor," particularly in the context of discussing a proposal where vaguely defined "offensive" speech would be deemed punishable. Such policies seldom allow "I was only kidding" excuses for jokes, yet a suggestion about beating people to a pulp is permissible? That's a serious double standard.
I do not need your permission to post to this thread or this list, Becky Yoose. On 1/25/13 11:01 AM, Becky Yoose wrote: > You know folks... > > ...when it gets to the point where no one recognized that Ranti's > comment about beating up someone might be an exaggeration - an attempt > a humor, if you will - to ask a real question (who do I report to if > I'm being harassed at the conference)... > > and > > ... if you had to explain that beating a person up will need to > involve the cops... > > and > > ... when multiple people posted multiple times, only to ask themselves > why they're posting in the first place... > > and > > ... when folks keep talking and talking and nothing seems to happen > with all this talking... > > and > > ... people rather post here and keep talking than actually do things, > like, for example, someone going to the github repo and editing the > anti-harassment policy or someone opening an issue/thread about > defining terms... > > ... it might be a good time to stop posting to this thread. -- Gary McGath, Professional Software Developer http://www.garymcgath.com