My fellow nerds,
I'm snipping *a lot* but in brief I definitely agree with Julie.
> Kyle’s main issue was really a question about what to do with
> private and anonymous feedback – not that we should avoid it, but rather we
> should discuss how that should be handled. For example, could someone
> summarize
> it, remove identifying details, and report back to the group? Not about the
> Duty Officer candidacy, since those are personnel issues, but rather about
> other
> feedback about harassment, etc. If we !
> have those channels, what do we do with the information that is received
> through
> them?
>
How about treating this like a security bug, since essentially it is? The
workflow I tend to see for that sort of starts with going to a closed group
initially, a fix being worked out RIGHT MEOW, and ends its journey with a
report of what the problem was l8trz. In the case of harassment, I don't think
it will ever be appropriate to know the name of the person that felt harassed,
but it would almost certainly be good for everyone to eventually know precisely
what happened so it's not repeated in future.
For many reasons, I like the anonymous feedback mechanism that is built in
currently.
Cheers,
Brooke
