Hi jonathan,

This is how i configured the testbed:

I have a windows 8 laptop connected directly on the tplink/openwrt router. 
Tplink is also connected to a gigabit switch.
So, i thought to make some file uploads from a linux samba file server 
connected to the switch to my windows 8 laptop, through SMB protocol (which 
uses TCP).

In order to create the bottleneck, tplink router has two 10/100mbits ports. So, 
i restricted the port connected to the switch to 10Mbit half duplex.

Also, i tried to decrease interval and target options in order to obtain a 
latency, for connections estabilished while upload is flowing, lower that 5 ms.
So i set target at 2ms and interval to 5ms.
So this is the schema:

laptop----tplink---switch---linuxserver

where tplink is routing subnets.

If i ping "linux server" i get very high latencies...and if i ping other PCs 
connected to the switch, i get about 10ms latencies.

I also tried to lower target at 1 ms and interval at 2ms, but i see the same 
effects.

If i disable fq_codel, i get always the same result.

Can you explain me where i'm going wrong?

Thanks

Da: Jonathan Morton [mailto:[email protected]]
Inviato: giovedì 20 dicembre 2012 19.08
A: Alessandro Bolletta
Cc: [email protected]
Oggetto: Re: [Codel] Making tests on Tp-link router powered by Openwrt svn


Is the bottleneck actually at your router, or (as is more usual) at the modem?

- Jonathan Morton
On Dec 20, 2012 7:57 PM, "Alessandro Bolletta" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi everybody,
Today i made some tests on my tplink home router powered by the lastest 
snapshot build of Openwrt.
So, i configured tc to make fq_codel the default queuing algorithm for 2 eth 
ports available on the router (leaving unchanged default values).
So, i started some TCP sessions through my Windows client and I loaded the 
available bandwidth...but the test wasn't going as expected because i 
experienced packet loss and high delays as i did when the default simple fifo 
queue was the default queue.
Is there something that i'm not understanding?

Thanks,
Alessandro Bolletta
_______________________________________________
Codel mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
_______________________________________________
Codel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel

Reply via email to