On 03/12/2014 04:23 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > On Mar 12, 2014 1:11 PM, "David Collier-Brown" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > [Off-topic] > > Someone with classic-typesetting-tools experience might wish to > > volunteer a pandoc-based process. See, for example, > > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/589196/0e8f212d7a59f556/ > > The fq codel rfc was written in pandoc, and converted via pandoc2rfc. > The raw texts are managed in git and in github. > > It took me a year of fiddling to get to acceptable output from this. > > The amount of effort required was comparable to getting a paper > formatted for the IEEE with TeX, with far less pleasing results than TeX. > > Certainly you have to be committed if you want to write an rfc. The > present process is a major barrier to entry. > > > > > --dave >
AARGH! I wasn't expecting that... --dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest [email protected] | -- Mark Twain
_______________________________________________ Codel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
