What RTT was fig 7 in the codel paper? (the one that showed codel's reaction to bandwidth changes?) http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2209336
I am amusing myself by trying to create an automated string of flent tests to duplicate those results, now that flent has gained tools that can plot queue depth as well as ping, we have a testbed with fully controllable RTT, etc. http://snapon.cs.kau.se/~d/nichols/basiccodel.png "To roughly emulate a (nominal) 100-Mbps Wi-Fi link subject to degradation, we used a load of four FTPs and five Web connections per second and changed link rates at 50-second intervals (over the 300 simulated seconds), first dropping to 10 Mbps, then to 1 Mbps, then jumping to 50 Mbps, dropping to 1 Mbps, and finally jumping back to 100 Mbps. Buffer capacity is a single BDP (830 packets) for the nominal rate. This scenario was repeated for CoDel, Tail Drop, and RED. " -- Dave Täht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi _______________________________________________ Codel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
