One other difference between the two builds looks strange, but I can't say
it's a problem. In the "check" case, the locals
generated for a method are all in order.
JAVA_INT
> online_tantrix_common_GameBoard_formForcedList___R_int(CODENAME_ONE_THREAD_STATE,
>
> JAVA_OBJECT __cn1ThisObject) {
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_1_ = 0; /* v1 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_2_ = 0; /* v2 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_3_ = 0; /* v3 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_4_ = 0; /* v4 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_5_ = 0; /* v5 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_6_ = 0; /* v6 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_7_ = 0; /* v7 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_8_ = 0; /* v8 */
> DEFINE_INSTANCE_METHOD_STACK(6, 9, 0, 9832, 9896);
>
whereas in the "nocheck" sources, the locals are perturbed into some other
order
JAVA_INT
> online_tantrix_common_GameBoard_formForcedList___R_int(CODENAME_ONE_THREAD_STATE,
>
> JAVA_OBJECT __cn1ThisObject) {
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_3_ = 0; /* v3 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_2_ = 0; /* v2 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_5_ = 0; /* v5 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_4_ = 0; /* v4 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_7_ = 0; /* v7 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_6_ = 0; /* v6 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_8_ = 0; /* v8 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_1_ = 0; /* v1 */
> DEFINE_INSTANCE_METHOD_STACK(6, 9, 0, 9832, 9896);
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CodenameOne Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to codenameone-discussions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/codenameone-discussions.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codenameone-discussions/4dea178c-6581-49ba-9a5c-4928334f6911%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
