Whatever the use of the command, the user MUST be 100+ user in the channel to use it, so it's the responsibility of the 400+ users to manage the userlist. Why would we deal with all kind of channel abuse by chanops on X? the 400+ just have to suspend/remove the access of the abuser and that's all.
Math [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Message d'origine----- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] De la part de Larry Envoyé : 1 mai, 2002 00:01 Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [Coder-Com] *!*@* ban abusability i think there should be a trigger to suspend and/or remove a user who uses the ban *!*@* thru X for 1 day, then increase to 2 days , then 3 for repeated usage by that user, per *!*@* ban if a useradd uses this command within 7 days of being added to X. This will then stop being a easy way to clear a channel thru X thru a *hacked* useradd. This kick/ban is popular to those idiots who gain access thru whatever means and clear the channel, to prove a pathetic point of their l33tn3ss. /m x ban *!*@* x x x etc ..... -X- Your access has been suspended for 24 hrs due to abuse or use of a restricted command then this user gets reported to cs-abuse or whatever, i favour an automatic removal of username in channel and tag as abusive username and suspended for x.period of time. Harsh but handy. wensu "Yeah well BEAM this up *PAL*!"
