On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 10:58 -0500, Michael Poole wrote: > > BTW, is this a change we should stick into .13, or are you comfortable > > with development of this in .12.pre10? > > The trie code should be .13-only, but that is orthogonal to the > changes you propose. If you have no objections, I would rather make a > .12.10 release before we start reworking the existing G-line logic.
That's fine. How long before you do the .12.10 release, though? I've already started by creating a macro to do iterations over G-line lists, so that I can centralize the logic that releases expired G-lines... -- Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
