On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 13:53, Donald WHIZZARD Lambert <[email protected]> wrote: > Fair enough. I did not think of those. > For join/part floods,
I always set +mir anyway :) About that... if introducing +M... wouldn't it be more ok to make +i & +r and +m & +M exclude each other, same as +p & +s ? > > Thanks for the clarification. > > -- Donnie > > Michael Poole wrote: >> Donald WHIZZARD Lambert writes: >> >>> Is there a real reason a user would want a >>> non registered user to not be able to join, but be able to >>> talk ? I can see the reverse, acting as the +m does now. >> >> In addition to what BlakJak mentioned, non-registered users might be >> invited to join by channel operators. Currently they would also have >> to be voiced. >> >> Entrope >> _______________________________________________ >> Coder-com mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com >> > > -- > Donald Lambert [email protected] > UnderNet IRC Network The Only IRC Network > http://www.undernet.org > _______________________________________________ > Coder-com mailing list > [email protected] > http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com > _______________________________________________ Coder-com mailing list [email protected] http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
