This one time, at band camp, James Purser wrote:
>This is a question for those with much more c/c++ experience than me. I
>have discovered that dapper and possibly breezy both lack the ld.so.conf
>file instead relying on ldconfig which only looks at /usr/lib and /lib
>for libraries.
>
>Is this a good thing? This is a serious question. When I asked about
>this I was told I shouldn't be using /usr/local/lib anymore. Considering
>how much software still defaults to building/installing
>in /usr/local/...

You know, I think this and Mike Lakes' questions were totally on topic for
the main SLUG list ;-)
_______________________________________________
coders mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/coders

Reply via email to