This one time, at band camp, Carlo Sogono wrote: >What constitutes the term "poor library"? Is it the poor construction of >interfaces or poor programming of the library itself? Or both? From what >I have heard from colleagues the OpenDiameter library for instance has >good interfaces (meaning easy to use) but bad implementation (slow, >memory leaks, etc.).
I first thought of this list when Erik started the thread: http://sourcefrog.net/weblog/software/aesthetics/interface-levels.html _______________________________________________ coders mailing list coders@slug.org.au http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/coders
