catchです 本家 Marketing Projectで、positioner (slogan)を決めようとしています。 スローガンというかキャッチコピーでしょうか。
現状は英語ですが、日本語としてはどんな感じにするのがいいと思いますか Jacqueline McNally wrote: > Hello > > For those of you that are not on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, following is > Bernhard's mail wrt a positioner or slogan. > > Due to the message being one among many on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the lists > slowing, the voting has been extended until Friday. But perhaps we can > include the weekend (Bernhard ?) if people here feel that they cannot > look at it until then. > > The proposed slogans are in English. I especially would like to ask > those who first language is not English to think about how they would > translate into LOTE (languages other than english). > > I know sometimes that slogans in particular do not translate well. Your > vote and input is invaluable. > > Regards > Jacqueline McNally > Lead, OpenOffice.org Marketing Project > > Are you a computer angel? (www.computerangels.org.au) > Linux.conf.au 2006 (www.linux.conf.au) > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Hi all, > > Bernhard Dippold wrote several weeks ago: > >> Hi, >> >> [...] I don't want to close the positioner voting in a few hours. > > > Now Koper and the major release are over and during the Minutes CC > meeting at Koper (see > http://council.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discuss&msgNo=714) > it was told that they don't want to decide about a marketing slogan > but they were "open to the idea". > > So I restart the voting for the positioner (a short slogan > containing the main points of a product, that can be used as entity > with the logo) again. > (If you want to get more infos, you may have a look at the thread: > http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?list=dev&by=thread&from=1053380) > > > > The voting procedure was quite complicated, so I try to tell it > again (perhaps more clearly): > > Everybody may give a different number (1 to 10) of points to up to > 10 proposals. > > This mean > - for the best proposal you give 10 points > - you may give 9 points for the second (if you want to) > - you don't have to use all your possible votes. Depending on your > personal preferences you may give 10 and 9 points to two > extraordinary proposals, 6,5 and 4 to some good ones and 2 or 1 to > others you can live with. > - please don't give the same points to two different proposals. > > We had 40 different proposals and I tried to file them to 7 > categories (and added the categories to the proposals) > A) OPEN DOCUMENT / FREEDOM > B) UPGRADE > C) OPEN SOURCE / OPEN LICENSE / OPEN CODE > D) QUALITY > E) MULTILINGUAL > F) FREE OF CHARGE > G) COMMUNITY / EMOTIONAL BINDING > > A more specific definition can be read in my original post > http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=21303 > > Six people did vote in the first voting - they may change their > opinion or leave their points as they were - so I tell you the > number of point already given to the proposals. > > > HERE THEY ARE: > > - (25 points) "Open. For business." (A, C, D) > - (17) "Free your files!" (A) > - (10) "Today's Office. Tomorrow's Standard." (A, B, D) > (or "Tomorrow's standard in Today's Office") > - (9) "The New Office Suite Standard" (A, D, E) > - (8) "Interoperable with the future" (A, B?, C) > - (8) "Upgrade to open standards" (A, B, C) > - (6) "For a world of freedom and choice!" (A, C) > - (5) "Passion unleashed!" (A, G) > - (3) "Open Suite for Open People" (A, C, G?) > - (2) "Office suite for open people" (G?) > - (0) "Freedom in more than 60 languages" (A, E) > - (0) "Don't let others create YOUR office suite!" (C) > - (0) "The easier way to work!" (D) > - (0) "Let Your OfficeSuite do the work!" (D) > - (0) "Give freedom a 2.0nd chance" (A, B) > - (0) "A 2.0nd chance for freedom" (A, B) > - (0) "Don't care for DigitalRightsManagement - it's free!" (A, F) > - (0) "Upgrade to open document exchange" (A, B, C) > - (0) "Open Doors. Open Source. OpenOffice.org" (A, C, E) > - (0) "Open. Professional. Social." (A, C, G, D) > - (0) "Upgrade to data freedom" (A, B, C) > - (0) "Your company. Your data. Your Office." (A, C, D) > - (0) "Compatible with your Office." (A, B, C, D) > - (0) "Don't sell your soul for an Upgrade, get it free!" (A, B, F) > - (0) "Free. In every sense." (A, C, F) > - (0) "Hackers wanted!" (C, G) > - (0) "Extreme Contributing" (C, G) > - (0) "I love my office suite!" (G) > - (0) "Be in charge of YOUR office suite!" (C) > - (0) "For a world with more than just one office suite!" (A) > - (0) "Be part of it!" (G) > - (0) "Where YOU can make a difference!" (C) > - (0) "Make friends around the globe!" (G) > - (0) "Do you have friends in all continents? I do!" (G) > - (0) "Don't let others own YOUR data!" (A) > - (0) "Upgrade to the Open Standard" (A, B, C) > - (0) "The passion office!" (G) > - (0) "Be in charge of YOUR documents!" (C) > - (0) "The other 'dating' forum!" (G) > - (0) "Be connected!" (A, G) > > I'd like to end the voting next Thursday - and with many people > joining in the vote we'll get a result that can be recommended as > "official" positioner for OpenOffice.org 2.0 > > Best regards > Bernhard > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Yutaka Kachi http://www.catch.jp/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
