Script 'mail_helper' called by obssrc
Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package lucene++ for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2021-01-25 18:23:27
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/lucene++ (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.lucene++.new.28504 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "lucene++"

Mon Jan 25 18:23:27 2021 rev:7 rq:866114 version:3.0.8

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/lucene++/lucene++.changes        2021-01-18 
11:33:47.620984042 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.lucene++.new.28504/lucene++.changes     
2021-01-25 18:23:45.804441115 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,7 @@
+Thu Jan 21 20:00:18 UTC 2021 - antoine.belv...@opensuse.org
+
+- Add CMake option to prevent installation of gtest files instead
+  of removing them by hand.
+- Remove obsolete build dependency on subversion.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ lucene++.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.9Sohrh/_old  2021-01-25 18:23:47.752443947 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.9Sohrh/_new  2021-01-25 18:23:47.756443953 +0100
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
 BuildRequires:  libboost_system-devel
 BuildRequires:  libboost_thread-devel
 BuildRequires:  pkgconfig
-BuildRequires:  subversion
 BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(bzip2)
 BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(zlib)
 
@@ -64,16 +63,11 @@
 %autosetup -p1 -n LucenePlusPlus-rel_%{version}
 
 %build
-%cmake
+%cmake -DINSTALL_GTEST=OFF
 %make_build lucene++ lucene++-contrib
 
 %install
 %cmake_install
-# These gtest files are not meant to be installed
-rm -r %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/g{mock,test}
-rm -r %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/cmake/GTest
-rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libg{mock,test}*.so
-rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/g{mock,test}*.pc
 
 %check
 # Exclude known failing test on ix86 
(https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/issues/98)

Reply via email to