This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

robbie pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
     new 8d9dddc14d NO-JIRA clarify doc on shared store read performance on 
startup, both replicated and shared store need to read the journal!
8d9dddc14d is described below

commit 8d9dddc14d77437baa55540b8da67e570d48290c
Author: Gary Tully <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 2 12:19:24 2025 +0100

    NO-JIRA clarify doc on shared store read performance on startup, both 
replicated and shared store need to read the journal!
---
 docs/user-manual/ha.adoc | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/user-manual/ha.adoc b/docs/user-manual/ha.adoc
index 4934d60f31..db3aeff7f9 100644
--- a/docs/user-manual/ha.adoc
+++ b/docs/user-manual/ha.adoc
@@ -86,10 +86,8 @@ Typically, this will be some kind of high performance 
Storage Area Network (SAN)
 Network Attached Storage (NAS), like an <<NFS Mount Recommendations,NFS 
mount>>, is viable but won't provide optimal performance.
 
 One main advantage of a shared store configuration is that no replication 
occurs between the primary and backup nodes which means it does not suffer any 
performance penalties due to the overhead of replication during normal 
operation.
-
-One potentially significant disadvantage of shared store versus replication is 
that it requires a shared file system, and when the backup server activates it 
needs to load the journal from the shared store which can take some time 
depending on the amount of data in the store and the speed of the store.
-
-If you require the highest performance during normal operation then acquire 
access to a fast SAN and deal with a slightly slower failover (depending on 
amount of data).
+The main disadvantage is that shared stores are typically less performant than 
local file stores. In particular, because the journal is always read in full on 
startup, the difference in read latency between local and shared storage can be 
a significant startup overhead. The shared store may need to be optimised for 
reads of size journal-file-size.
+If you require the highest performance then acquire access to a fast SAN.
 
 [TIP]
 .What About Split Brain?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to