mik-laj opened a new pull request #12420:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12420
```
:func:`validate` will first verify that the provided schema is
itself valid, since not doing so can lead to less obvious error
messages and fail in less obvious or consistent ways.
If you know you have a valid schema already, especially if you
intend to validate multiple instances with the same schema, you
likely would prefer using the `IValidator.validate` method directly
on a specific validator (e.g. ``Draft7Validator.validate``).
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing! Please make sure that your code changes
are covered with tests. And in case of new features or big changes
remember to adjust the documentation.
Feel free to ping committers for the review!
In case of existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
closes: #ISSUE
related: #ISSUE
How to write a good git commit message:
http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
-->
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvements+Proposals))
is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party
License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in
[UPDATING.md](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/UPDATING.md).
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
