[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16814533#comment-16814533
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4269:
-----------------------------------------

XD-DENG commented on pull request #5076: [AIRFLOW-4269] Minor acceleration of 
jobs._process_task_instances()
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5076
 
 
   ### Jira
   
     - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4269
   
   
   ### Description
   
   - [x] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI 
changes:
   
   `continue` here should be a `break`.
   
   When `len(active_dag_runs) >= dag.max_active_runs`, the following part of 
the for-loop will give the same result and result in a `continue` again and 
again, while doing nothing. We should use a `break` here.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> For-lop in jobs._process_task_instances can be faster by breaking from 
> unnecessary steps
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-4269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4269
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.2
>            Reporter: Xiaodong DENG
>            Assignee: Xiaodong DENG
>            Priority: Minor
>
> [https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/64331aa5b90c44a3a22631d0ed168c44842a1fc8/airflow/jobs.py#L923]
>  is a "continue" while it should be a break.
> When *len(active_dag_runs) >= dag.max_active_runs* , the following part of 
> the for-loop will give the same result and result in a "continue" again and 
> again, doing nothing. 
> We should use a "break" here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to