AnithaG-Oak edited a comment on issue #19618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19618#issuecomment-971215617


   > But the calendar widget introduced in #16141 does not employ sub-second 
accurary, so the milliseconds become zero, and all manually-triggered runs now 
evaluate the expression to
   
   dag.following_schedule(execution_date).isoformat()
   instead, which always fails because a manually triggered run never has a 
following schedule (both prior and after AIP-39).
   
   
   
   also this reasoning doesn't hold true for this issue since the error is seen 
for scheduled sub dags


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to