potiuk commented on PR #28300:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28300#issuecomment-1363215643

   One other point (which very much concurs with what I described  in my 
proposal about executor is actually something that @Taragolis noticed.
   
    https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28538#issuecomment-1363130466
   
   Previously we could not really move Celery and Kubernetes executors to a 
provider, while with AiP-51 implemented in 2.6 we actually could.  I am not 
sure if we would like to (CeleryKubernetesExecutor is a bit probllematic) - but 
in theory after AIP-51 gets implemented, both Celery and Kubernetes executor 
**could** be entirely moved into the providers. 
   
   Whether we should do it or not is another story (and completely different 
discussion that we might be having),
   
   This is what I mean as truly decoupled and well defined interface
   
   @BasPH  -> does it make sense.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to