vincbeck commented on PR #761:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/761#issuecomment-1495987528

   > > I think I'd go half-way. Remove All 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 1.10 docs from the 
index. That would likely be a much better choice. We already have somewhat soft 
deprecation mechanism via providers. It's not "you should upgrade" but "if you 
don't, latest provider releases will not be installable for you". In May we 
bump it to 2.4, so we can add 2.3 to the exclusions too.
   > 
   > Yeah I am happy with that. But we should add the big red banner with 
warning that this is an old version and provide link for stable version.
   > 
   > Example with SQLAlchemy: 
(https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/14/intro.html#installation)
   > 
   > <img alt="image" width="387" 
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8811558/229796562-b2f45721-2e34-42f3-b2b1-b7d1c28f1bf3.png";>
   > 
   > Example with [Astro 
SDK](https://astro-sdk-python.readthedocs.io/en/1.5.2/) (that uses 
ReadTheDocs): <img alt="image" width="1067" 
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8811558/229796841-5452a2b7-e864-48b2-bb5f-a62647667558.png";>
   
   Agree with this. Though, I was thinking splitting the change in two PRs, 
this one exclusively about the robots.txt change and then I (or someone else?) 
will create another one to add the banner


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to