grjones commented on code in PR #32000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32000#discussion_r1282740648


##########
airflow/models/dag.py:
##########
@@ -2738,22 +2738,48 @@ def add_logger_if_needed(ti: TaskInstance):
         )
 
         tasks = self.task_dict
+
+        task_try_numbers: dict[tuple[str, int], int] = 
collections.defaultdict(int)
+
         self.log.debug("starting dagrun")
         # Instead of starting a scheduler, we run the minimal loop possible to 
check
         # for task readiness and dependency management. This is notably faster
         # than creating a BackfillJob and allows us to surface logs to the user
         while dr.state == DagRunState.RUNNING:
             schedulable_tis, _ = dr.update_state(session=session)
-            try:
-                for ti in schedulable_tis:
+
+            for ti in schedulable_tis:
+                try:
                     add_logger_if_needed(ti)
                     ti.task = tasks[ti.task_id]
                     _run_task(ti, session=session)
-            except Exception:
-                self.log.info(
-                    "Task failed. DAG will continue to run until finished and 
be marked as failed.",
-                    exc_info=True,
-                )
+                except Exception:
+                    if ti.state == TaskInstanceState.UP_FOR_RETRY:
+                        try_number = task_try_numbers[ti.task_id, ti.map_index]
+                        if try_number > ti.max_tries:
+                            ti.set_state(TaskInstanceState.FAILED)
+                        else:
+                            task_try_numbers[ti.task_id, ti.map_index] = 
try_number + 1
+                    self.log.info(
+                        "Task failed. DAG will continue to run until finished 
and be marked as failed.",
+                        exc_info=True,
+                    )
+            for ti in dr.get_task_instances(session=session, 
state=TaskInstanceState.SCHEDULED):

Review Comment:
   Is the triggerer intended to be a available to `dag.test()' though? It 
definitely wouldn't be running in unit tests. My understanding is that this 
method is a crude replacement for scheduling so they you don't have to run a 
scheduler. Wouldn't the same idea apply to an external triggerer?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to