ephraimbuddy commented on issue #34065: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34065#issuecomment-1705460296
> I encountered an issue when upgrading to 2.7.1rc1, linked to the pydantic > upgrade. Do I open a seperate issue for this or can this be discussed here? Great expectations does not yet support pydantic > 2.0: [great-expectations/great_expectations#8604](https://github.com/great-expectations/great_expectations/pull/8604) <[great-expectations/great_expectations#8604](https://github.com/great-expectations/great_expectations/pull/8604)> Airflow doesn't have an official integration/support for great expectations, so if great expectations doesn't support pydantic v2 which we use in 2.7.1, IMHO this should not be considered a breaking change. > […](#) > On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 5:28 PM Andrey Anshin ***@***.***> wrote: Check on fresh Airflow 2.7.1.rc1 - #33672 <#33672> - Less intensive queries to DB. Shorter execution time, less traffic between backend and Airflow - #33503 <#33503> - Seems working with Postgres/MySQL as expected - #33535 <#33535> - Work as expected in the UI — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <[#34065 (comment)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34065#issuecomment-1705448342)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFCS775S3YTSFWWQA7LUH6LXYXXQLANCNFSM6AAAAAA4J6KWGM> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***> Not a breaking change but great expectation is widely used, I think we should consider it -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
