moiseenkov commented on issue #35234:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35234#issuecomment-1801376901

   > > > Also after this comment @vincbeck @jedcunningham - I think we should 
re-evaluate the result of our discussion whether Auth Mnagers should return 
FlaskApi from #34349 - because that might limit our abillity to move to 
Connexion 3 when we introduce Auth Managers, and we certainly would not want 
this.
   > > 
   > > 
   > > I agree. But what is the plan? Are we going to create Flask application 
through connexion now as suggested by @RobbeSneyders `connexion.FlaskApp`? If 
yes then we can use `connexion_app.add_api(spec, **kwargs)`
   > 
   > I do not think we have a plan yet, but it looks like yes, we should be 
doing that - maybe even before we release 2.8
   
   I assume that it should be done as soon as possible because it blocks 
upgrade of `Werkzeug` up to version 3.0.1 that patches [vulnerability 
issue](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-46136). The upgrade of 
`Werkzeug` requires an upgrade of `Connexion`  up to version 3.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to