Throne3d opened a new pull request, #35854:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35854

   <!--
    Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    distributed with this work for additional information
    regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
   
      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
   
    Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
    software distributed under the License is distributed on an
    "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
    KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
    specific language governing permissions and limitations
    under the License.
    -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing! Please make sure that your code changes
   are covered with tests. And in case of new features or big changes
   remember to adjust the documentation.
   
   Feel free to ping committers for the review!
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   closes: #ISSUE
   related: #ISSUE
   
   How to write a good git commit message:
   http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   -->
   related: #34207
   
   Based on issue #34207 and my own testing, it seems ExternalTaskSensor 
doesn't work properly with `deferrable=True` when trying to sense a full DAG 
(i.e. when passing a DAG ID but external_task_id=None), blocking for some time 
then timing out with an unclear failure. The Trigger also doesn't look to be 
set up for other use cases supported in the usual blocking implementation - 
multiple task IDs, or task groups. I don't have the confidence to fix the 
trigger for these use cases, but wanted to add a warning so other people would 
be aware of this limitation from the documentation rather than stumbling into 
it like me! =)
   
   Things that I'm still unsure of:
   * Is there a good way to reference an issue from within a warning block? 
(And is a warning block appropriate for this?)
   * Is it worth adding a doc newsfragment for this?
   
   <!-- Please keep an empty line above the dashes. -->
   ---
   **^ Add meaningful description above**
   Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information.
   In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party 
License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a 
newsfragment file, named `{pr_number}.significant.rst` or 
`{issue_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/newsfragments).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to