potiuk commented on code in PR #36197:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36197#discussion_r1425721184


##########
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/airflow_bug_report.yml:
##########
@@ -31,17 +31,26 @@ body:
         - "Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)"
     validations:
       required: true
+  - type: input
+    attributes:
+      label: If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

Review Comment:
   Yeah - I think there were two motivations to remove the versions from list:
   
   1) It became far too long to be useful in terms of UX
   2) we wanted to make people a bit aware that something they are reporting on 
is not "current" 
   
   I think adding separate input field does not vioiate any of this.
   
   I am even tempted to use it to strengthen 2) a bit. . Why don't we add a 
comment / Hint to that field similar to:
   
   `The current versions of Airlfow can selected from the dro-down above and 
you are advised to upgrade and check if your issue is solved there. If you use 
old version of Airflow and you cannot upgrade, type your version here - but not 
we might advise you to ugprade first".
   
   
   Maybe not as aggressive but i think something like that could help a bit 
with communicating what we want to communicate.
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to