potiuk commented on PR #36517: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36517#issuecomment-1873242002
Once concern is backwards compatibility (and I think that's where @kaxil's solution came from). But yeah, I think you are right @jscheffl @dirrao - probably return value is not **teally** compatibility promise (and we can treat it as bugfix). We've already done the same in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35378 (and It was me who proposed skipping the flag and treating it as bugfix :D ... Now I remember . -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
