dstandish commented on PR #36639: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36639#issuecomment-2021080626
@syun64 sorry that i have not been active on this for a while. my concern is that i don't think it's an SLA if it's evaluated against "when it started" -- i think an SLA is about "when it should have run" the customer doesn't care when your dag started, they care about when their data is updated. that is an overly-broad generalization but i think it illustrates the point. i think that we can and should add an SLA on the dag. but to me i don't think that it's an SLA if you're evaluating against when it started running, even if for example the run started very late. i think the fact that "when it should have run" does not make sense for manually triggered or dataset-triggered dags is not a good reason to change the definition for scheduled dags. i think we need to come up with a different solution for those kinds of dags. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
