potiuk commented on issue #40116: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40116#issuecomment-2155084921
> The weird thing is that they were being printed in the version we were using previously (`1.10.12`), but not in the new one. Are you aware of any major changes made to the mechanism used in the PostgreSQL operators? Well Airflow 1.10 is end of life for more than 3 years - this is when all users were supposed to migrate and nobody remembers anything that was there (there were probablly 10.000 or so changes and no backwards compatibility even expected for 1.10. If you had migrated back then probably you would find someone who would know somothing, but being 3 years late with the migration does not help. You can take a look at release notes since then or code changes (probably few thousands of entries) and see if you can find somethign because what's written in the release notes is the best trace of what had happend between the 3 years untouched version and now. At this stage this is a feature to be implemented, not even a bug, and even if it were classified as a bug it falls into "hopefully someone will pick an interest and implement it" - this is a free open-source software and comes "as is" and generally a lot of people contribute what they need if it is missing. If you are in a hurry and do not want to wait for someone to show up - the most certain way to get something like that is to roll sleeves up and do it (or find someone who is more able if you don't feel like doing it yourself). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
