potiuk opened a new pull request, #45955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/45955

   While testing "standard" provider move to the new structure it turned out, 
that "providers" package used now to keep tests in the new providers is 
problematic - while it solves the ambiguity of "from celery import", it 
introduces another ambiguity when trying to import internal utility classes in 
tests. For example when trying to import BasePythonTest in standard operatori 
currently we refer to the import from root directory of Airflow::
   
   ```
   from providers.tests.standard.operators.test_python
   ```
   
   However, if we change the package structure to have `providers` as 
subpackage of `tests` and trying to import it from `tests` as root folder to 
tests, we have:
   
   ```
   from providers.standard.operators.test_python
   ```
   
   And it can ambiguously attempt to import
   
   ```
   from airflow.providers.standard.operators.test_python
   ```
   
   This confuses IDEs and attempts to run multiple tests together, because 
pytest modifies PYTHONPATH while running tests - and PYTHONPATH modification 
can be different, depending on which tests are selected to run.
   
   Changing the sub-package to provider_tests makes it unambiguous and we can 
now import:
   
   ```
   from provider_tests.standard.operators.test_python
   ```
   
   This is unambiguous and allows to import the tests inside the provider 
package, without importing from root of Airlfow package - making provider 
package tests "standalone" inside provider.
   
   <!--
    Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    distributed with this work for additional information
    regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
   
      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
   
    Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
    software distributed under the License is distributed on an
    "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
    KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
    specific language governing permissions and limitations
    under the License.
    -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing! Please make sure that your code changes
   are covered with tests. And in case of new features or big changes
   remember to adjust the documentation.
   
   Feel free to ping committers for the review!
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   closes: #ISSUE
   related: #ISSUE
   
   How to write a good git commit message:
   http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   -->
   
   
   
   <!-- Please keep an empty line above the dashes. -->
   ---
   **^ Add meaningful description above**
   Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information.
   In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party 
License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a 
newsfragment file, named `{pr_number}.significant.rst` or 
`{issue_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/newsfragments).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to