potiuk commented on code in PR #49336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49336#discussion_r2197925447
##########
scripts/in_container/bin/install_java.sh:
##########
@@ -34,7 +43,7 @@ if command -v java; then
exit 1
fi
-DOWNLOAD_URL='https://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk8u41/ri/openjdk-8u41-b04-linux-x64-14_jan_2020.tar.gz'
+DOWNLOAD_URL='https://download.oracle.com/java/23/latest/jdk-23_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz'
Review Comment:
> They may not be distributed
> Apache projects may not distribute Category X licensed components, in
source or binary form; in ASF source code or in convenience binaries. As with
the previous question on platforms, you can rely on the component if its
license terms do not affect the Apache product's licensing. For example, using
a GPL'ed tool during the build is okay, but including GPL'ed source code is not.
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
##########
scripts/in_container/bin/install_java.sh:
##########
@@ -34,7 +43,7 @@ if command -v java; then
exit 1
fi
-DOWNLOAD_URL='https://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk8u41/ri/openjdk-8u41-b04-linux-x64-14_jan_2020.tar.gz'
+DOWNLOAD_URL='https://download.oracle.com/java/23/latest/jdk-23_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz'
Review Comment:
> # They may not be distributed
>
> Apache projects may not distribute Category X licensed components, in
source or binary form; in ASF source code or in convenience binaries. As with
the previous question on platforms, you can rely on the component if its
license terms do not affect the Apache product's licensing. For example, using
a GPL'ed tool during the build is okay, but including GPL'ed source code is not.
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
