Pad71 opened a new issue, #56874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/56874

   ### Apache Airflow version
   
   3.1.0
   
   ### If "Other Airflow 2/3 version" selected, which one?
   
   _No response_
   
   ### What happened?
   
   When a DAG contains one or more Task Groups, the task ordering in the Grid 
View becomes inconsistent or incorrect. Tasks are not displayed in the same 
order as they are defined in the DAG file.
   
   This makes the visual representation confusing — execution order and 
dependencies are correct, but the UI order in the GridView does not match the 
DAG definition.
   
   For example (code bellow), the expected sequential order of tasks is 
START_PROC → GRP_PROC → FINISH_PROC, but in Grid View they appear in the wrong 
order (see the screenshot below). 
   
   <img width="472" height="238" alt="Image" 
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e42eedb-42cc-4ab3-b11a-8d71e58ff46d";
 />
   
   I also tested it with a standard Task Group definition ( with 
TaskGroup(group_id... ) and with dependencies defined using the .set_upstream 
syntax.
   
   Code:
   
   ```
   from datetime import datetime, timedelta
   from airflow import DAG
   from airflow.operators.empty import EmptyOperator
   from airflow.sdk import task_group
   
   with DAG(
       dag_id="TASK_GROUP_TEST",
       schedule = None,
       start_date = datetime(2025, 10, 15),
   ) as dag:
       
       START_PROC = EmptyOperator(
           task_id = 'START_PROC',    
           trigger_rule = "none_failed",
       )
       
       @task_group(group_id="GRP_PROC")
       def GRP_PROC():    
           TEST_TASK = EmptyOperator(
               task_id = 'TEST_TASK',        
               trigger_rule = "none_failed",
           )    
           TEST_TASK2 = EmptyOperator(
               task_id = 'TEST_TASK2',        
               trigger_rule = "none_failed",
           )
           TEST_TASK2.set_upstream(TEST_TASK)
   
       tgi_GRP_PROC = GRP_PROC()
   
       FINISH_PROC = EmptyOperator(
           task_id = 'FINISH_PROC',
           trigger_rule = "none_failed",
       )
       
       START_PROC >> tgi_GRP_PROC >> FINISH_PROC
   ```
   
   ### What you think should happen instead?
   
   the expected sequential order of tasks is START_PROC → GRP_PROC → FINISH_PROC
   
   ### How to reproduce
   
   Deploy this Dag and look at the GridView
   ```
   from datetime import datetime, timedelta
   from airflow import DAG
   from airflow.operators.empty import EmptyOperator
   from airflow.sdk import task_group
   
   with DAG(
       dag_id="TASK_GROUP_TEST",
       schedule = None,
       start_date = datetime(2025, 10, 15),
   ) as dag:
       
       START_PROC = EmptyOperator(
           task_id = 'START_PROC',    
           trigger_rule = "none_failed",
       )
       
       @task_group(group_id="GRP_PROC")
       def GRP_PROC():    
           TEST_TASK = EmptyOperator(
               task_id = 'TEST_TASK',        
               trigger_rule = "none_failed",
           )    
           TEST_TASK2 = EmptyOperator(
               task_id = 'TEST_TASK2',        
               trigger_rule = "none_failed",
           )
           TEST_TASK2.set_upstream(TEST_TASK)
   
       tgi_GRP_PROC = GRP_PROC()
   
       FINISH_PROC = EmptyOperator(
           task_id = 'FINISH_PROC',
           trigger_rule = "none_failed",
       )
       
       START_PROC >> tgi_GRP_PROC >> FINISH_PROC
   ```
   
   ### Operating System
   
   Windows 11 , Docker
   
   ### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Deployment
   
   Official Apache Airflow Helm Chart
   
   ### Deployment details
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Anything else?
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Are you willing to submit PR?
   
   - [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
   
   ### Code of Conduct
   
   - [x] I agree to follow this project's [Code of 
Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to