potiuk commented on PR #60437: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/60437#issuecomment-3745405732
> @eladkal or @potiuk need some providers managers power knowledge - some providers I have marked with "Not docs only" and then the other fixes were hidden from classification such that docs only update is made. Others marked with docs only ( because of year change in NOTICE) were docs only but not rendered changelogs... for consistency do I need to make all providers with NOTICE changes being a release (forced) to distribute or shall I downgrade the "docs only" releases to the same that are just for NOTICE? Sorry for late notice - I was away and disconnected last few days - and I am now struck with cold and trying to catch up :) Not sure if I understand :) -> but let me rephrase and see if I got it right: * when you selected "docs-only" -> the hash commit of the docs changed and no changelog was modified, no release is going to happen (so far so good) * when you selected not docs only and hid the others, there is a release (patchlevel) but it has "Docs-only" section in changelog Correct? If so - that's an interesting question - but I think the problem is that NOTICE change is not doc-only - it's a `misc` change - i.e. this change is actually going to change the released distribution (it will have updated NOTICE in metadata. "Doc-only" changes are changes that only impact generated documentation - not the released package. In this case NOTICE change **actually** changes the released distribution so we should make it Misc. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
