Lee-W commented on code in PR #61702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/61702#discussion_r2791041700


##########
airflow-core/src/airflow/models/serialized_dag.py:
##########
@@ -418,6 +418,68 @@ def _generate_deadline_uuids(cls, dag_data: dict[str, 
Any]) -> dict[str, dict]:
 
         return uuid_mapping
 
+    @classmethod
+    def _try_reuse_deadline_uuids(
+        cls,
+        existing_deadline_uuids: list[str],
+        new_deadline_data: list[dict],
+        session: Session,
+    ) -> dict[str, dict] | None:
+        """
+        Try to reuse existing deadline UUIDs if the deadline definitions 
haven't changed.
+
+        Returns None if Deadline hashes are not all identical, indicating they 
need to be updated.
+
+        :param existing_deadline_uuids: List of UUID strings from existing 
serialized dag
+        :param new_deadline_data: List of new deadline alert data dicts from 
the DAG
+        :param session: Database session
+        :return: UUID mapping dict if all match, None if any mismatch detected
+        """
+        if len(existing_deadline_uuids) != len(new_deadline_data):
+            return None
+
+        existing_alerts = session.scalars(
+            
select(DeadlineAlertModel).where(DeadlineAlertModel.id.in_(existing_deadline_uuids))
+        ).all()
+
+        if len(existing_alerts) != len(existing_deadline_uuids):
+            return None
+
+        new_alerts_temp = []
+        for deadline_alert in new_deadline_data:
+            deadline_data = deadline_alert.get(Encoding.VAR, deadline_alert)
+            # Create a temporary alert for comparison
+            temp_alert = DeadlineAlertModel(
+                id="temp",  # id is required for the object but isn't included 
in the __eq__

Review Comment:
   > Or perhaps I misunderstood and the point was that the custom __eq__ was 
what is causing confusion because someone might assume it's using object 
equivalence
   
   Yes, this is how I feel and why I'm confused 🤔 
   
   > Maybe I need a comment in the code to call out that it's a custom __eq__ 
and not the default?
   
   I feel like creating a new function would be less confusing.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to