Eason09053360 commented on PR #62357: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/62357#issuecomment-3978898585
> I don’t like this doesn’t really improve anything. Do you intend to make use of `response_ready` so this is a functional improvement, instead of just satisfying the linter rule without any real benefit? Thanks for pointing that out! I agree that just satisfying the linter without any real functional benefit isn't the right approach. Would it be acceptable if I revert the code back to asyncio.sleep(self.poke_interval) and simply add # noqa: ASYNC110 for now to cleanly resolve the linter rule in this PR? Once I figure out how to properly implement `response_ready`, I'd love to submit it in a follow-up PR! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
