potiuk commented on issue #62537: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/62537#issuecomment-3986622338
> > > [#59392](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/59392) need some improvement according to [#62353](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/62353) > > > > > > [@henry3260](https://github.com/henry3260) -> I am bit torn on that - this is a new feature added, so it does not introduce a regression, but seems that this feature does not work as intended. I would be inclined to make an rc3 for that as well assuming that we can get it in quickly. I see the PR is already prepared but draft [#62560](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/62560) - do you think it's close to be good and tested ? [@wilsonhooi86](https://github.com/wilsonhooi86) - could you maybe test it with the patch from [@henry3260](https://github.com/henry3260) ? > > My preference is for a faster release dropping the new feature. I think it's always best to revert rather than try fix it on the fly. Cc [@potiuk](https://github.com/potiuk) Can someone prepare the revert :) ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
