o-nikolas commented on PR #63746: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/63746#issuecomment-4070694749
> Thanks for catching this @o-nikolas @Aakcht and for the quick fix in #63746. > > You're right — my fix in #63110 correctly registered `execute_workload` for the Airflow 3.x path but missed that the Airflow 2.x `execute_command` task name needed to be set explicitly to match what workers expect. > > The fix in #63746 looks correct — setting the explicit task name on the legacy module-level app ensures Airflow 2.x workers receive the short name they look for. Happy to help test or review if needed. Thanks for the review @kalluripradeep! If it looks good to you, please approve the PR :slightly_smiling_face: Also any testing is always welcomed, especially with this type of edge case. I tests manually but please double check my work -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
