potiuk opened a new pull request, #66055: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/66055
The `draft` / `comment-only` / `close` PR-triage comment templates carried multi-paragraph remediation prose, a Slack invite, and an inline "what to do next" list that mostly paraphrased the linked Pull Request quality criteria doc. Trim them to one short body + a link, and replace the per-violation inline `prek` / `breeze` commands with a doc link so each violation bullet stays on one line. Kept: - "Not a rejection" reassurance on `draft` and `close` (where it carries weight). - No-rush line and the AI-attribution footer. - Canonical "Pull Request quality criteria" link text — re-triage classification uses it as a marker (per the file's own warning). - Rebase note when the branch is >50 commits behind base, shortened. The other contributor-facing templates (`review-nudge`, `reviewer-ping`, `mark-ready-with-ping`, `stale-*` and `suspicious-changes`) were already terse and untouched. --- ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR? - [X] Yes — Claude Code (Opus 4.7) Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.7) following [the guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
