radhwene commented on PR #66652:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/66652#issuecomment-4415269132

   Hi @potiuk ,
   
   Apologies for the inactivity on #61148. I was away during late April and 
early May and missed the triage comments and the auto-close on 2026-05-06.
   
   I’m now back and would like to resume the work. Since the original PR could 
not be reopened, I opened a fresh PR that supersedes it: **#66652**.
   
   What changed in the new PR:
   
   - Rebased the branch on the current `main` branch. The previous branch was 
significantly behind.
   - Squashed the previous commits into a single clean commit with the correct 
author identity.
   - Kept the implementation aligned with the last reviewed state of #61148. No 
intentional functional changes were introduced during the rebase/history 
cleanup.
   
   I will continue addressing the remaining feedback from the previous review 
and triage comments in #66652, especially:
   
   - the previously failing CI checks, including static checks, MyPy provider 
checks, and provider compatibility tests;
   - the pending review feedback from @MaksYermak ;
   - the unresolved review threads from the previous PR.
   
   Thanks again for your patience, and sorry for the gap. Could you please take 
a look at #66652 when you have a chance? I’ll address any remaining feedback 
there.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to