potiuk commented on PR #70678: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70678#issuecomment-5129795986
Thanks for the work here, but this duplicates #70493, which makes the same change to the same three files and was opened two days earlier. That one has already been reviewed and approved, so I'm closing this in its favour. This is the third time this week a PR of yours has landed on top of someone else's earlier one — #70621 duplicated #70449, and #70437 duplicates #70369. I'm not questioning the quality of the work; the analysis in all three was sound. But each duplicate costs the original author a rebase race and a reviewer a second pass over the same diff, and it's avoidable. Before starting on an operator, `gh pr list --search "<operator name>"` (or a quick search on the PR list) will show whether one is already in flight. If there is, reviewing it or offering an improvement in a comment is far more valuable than a parallel PR — Airflow's "better PR wins" convention exists for genuinely different approaches, not near-identical ones. There are still several unclaimed entries in `scripts/ci/prek/validate_operators_init_exemptions.txt` if you'd like to pick one up — just worth checking first that nobody else has. --- Drafted-by: Claude Code (Opus 5); reviewed by @potiuk before posting -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
